Art. 261. Challenging to a duel. — The penalty of prision correccional in its minimum period shall be imposed upon any person who shall challenge another, or incite another to give or accept a challenge to a duel, or shall scoff at or decry another publicly for having refused to accept a challenge to fight a duel.
Acts punished:
1. By challenging another to a duel.
2. By inciting another to give or accept a challenge to a duel.
3. By scoffing at or decrying another publicly for having refuses to accept a challenge to fight a duel.
Persons responsible:
1. Challenger
2. Instigators
ELEMENTS:
1. Previous agreement to engage in a combat;
2. Two or more seconds for each combatant; and
3. Choice of arms and other terms of agreement must be agreed upon by the seconds.
1. Previous agreement to engage in a combat;
2. Two or more seconds for each combatant; and
3. Choice of arms and other terms of agreement must be agreed upon by the seconds.
NOTES:
• Not all pre-agreed fights is a duel because the elements above must be complied with.
• A challenge to fight, without contemplating a duel is not a “challenging to a duel.” The person making the challenge must have in mind a formal combat to be concerted between him and the one who challenged in the presence of two or more seconds .
• A challenge to fight, without contemplating a duel is not a “challenging to a duel.” The person making the challenge must have in mind a formal combat to be concerted between him and the one who challenged in the presence of two or more seconds .
• A person who had ill-feelings and moved by hatred, the accused challenged the offended party to a duel, inciting the latter to accept said challenge by uttering: “Come down, let us measure your prowess, we shall see whose intestine will come out. You are a coward if you do not come down.” The offended party refused to come down and accept the challenge. Later when the accused saw the offended party running toward a nearby house, the accused chased him but desisted upon seeing that the offended party had a companion. The accused was found guilty only of LIGHT THREATS.
References:
Leonor D. Boado, Notes and Cases on the Revised Penal Code, 2004 ed.
Luis B. Reyes, The Revised Penal Code, Book II, 2001 ed.