Viuda de Tan Toco vs. Municipal Council of Iloilo




VIUDA DE TAN TOCO vs. MUN. COUNCIL OF ILOILO
G.R. No. L-24950, March 25, 1926, 49 Phil. 52

FACTS:

The widow of Tan Toco sued the Municipality of Iloilo for the amount of P42,966.40 representing the purchase price of a strip of land which was taken by the Municipality to widen a public street. When the municipality was unable to pay the judgment, the widow obtained a writ of execution by virtue of which the sheriff attached two auto trucks used for street sprinkling, one police patrol automobile, two police stations, and two markets, including the lots on which they had been constructed. The provincial fiscal  filed a motion praying that the attachment on the said property be dissolved as being illegal and violative of the rights of the defendant municipality. CFI granted the motion. Hence this appeal.

ISSUE:

Whether or not the property levied upon is exempt from execution

HELD:

No. Movable and immovable property of a municipality, necessary for governmental purpose, may not be attached and sold for the payment of a judgment against the municipality. The supreme reason for this rule is the character of the public use to which such kind of property is devoted. The necessity for government service justifies that the property of public of the municipality be exempt from execution just as it is necessary to exempt certain property of private individuals in accordance with section 452 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Even the municipal income, according to the above quoted authorities, is exempt from levy and execution. In volume 1, page 467, Municipal Corporations by Dillon we find that:

Municipal corporations are instituted by the supreme authority of a state for the public good. They exercise, by delegation from the legislature, a portion of the sovereign power. The main object of their creation is to act as administrative agencies for the state, and to provide for the police and local government of certain designated civil divisions of its territory. To this end they are invested with certain governmental powers and charged with civil, political, and municipal duties. To enable them beneficially to exercise these powers and discharge these duties, they are clothed with the authority to raise revenues, chiefly by taxation, and subordinately by other modes as by licenses, fines, and penalties. The revenue of the public corporation is the essential means by which it is enabled to perform its appointed work. Deprived of its regular and adequate supply of revenue, such a corporation is practically destroyed and the ends of its erection thwarted. Based upon considerations of this character, it is the settled doctrine of the law that only the public property but also the taxes and public revenues of such corporations cannot be seized under execution against them, either in the treasury or when in transit to it. Judgments rendered for taxes, and the proceeds of such judgments in the hands of officers of the law, are not subject to execution unless so declared by statute. The doctrine of the inviolability of the public revenues by the creditor is maintained, although the corporation is in debt, and has no means of payment but the taxes which it is authorized to collect.





Comments
0 Comments

0 comments : on " Viuda de Tan Toco vs. Municipal Council of Iloilo "

Post a Comment